Ramanujan's Lost Notebook (English, George E. Andrews | Bruce C. Berndt)
4.7(3 reviews)Inclusive of all applicable taxes. Free shipping on orders above ₹499, else ₹49 flat.
Available Offers
- 🚚Free Delivery — Free on orders above ₹499, else ₹49 flat
- 💵Cash on Delivery — Pay when your order arrives
- ↩️15-Day Easy Returns — Hassle-free return policy
- 🔒Cash on Delivery — Pay safely when your order arrives
Check Delivery
Specifications
| Publisher | Springer |
| Language | English |
| ISBN-13 | 9780387777658 |
| ISBN-10 | 0387777652 |
| Author | George E. Andrews | Bruce C. Berndt |
Product Description
Here on GlowMirror, you'll find Ramanujan's Lost Notebook filed under Springer -- everything you need to know is covered below.
About the Book
In the spring of 1976, George Andrews discovered a sheaf of 138 pages in the handwriting of Srinivasa Ramanujan. This manuscript was soon designated "Ramanujan's lost notebook" Its discovery has frequently been deemed the mathematical equivalent of finding Beethoven's tenth symphony. The "lost notebook" contains considerable material on mock theta functions and so undoubtedly emanates from the last year of Ramanujan's life. It should be emphasize…
ISBN: 9780387777658
Book Insights
What You'll Learn
- ·In-depth exploration of topics covered in Ramanujan's Lost Notebook
- ·Key concepts explained with clarity and practical examples
- ·Insights valuable for anyone studying or working in Springer
Who Should Read This
Students and professionals interested in Springer, as well as general readers looking to expand their knowledge.
Key Highlights
- ·Brand new physical book delivered across India
- ·15-day hassle-free return policy
Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars
Even more thoughtful and challenging than part I
5.0 out of 5 stars
It's excellent book
Fachbuchreihe Mathematik
Ist ein Fachbuch. Habe in diesem Falle nchts anderes erwartet. Kannte bereits zuvor diese Bücher(Notizbuch Teil I mt IV). Wollte diese besitzen Zwecks tierem Studium. Also diese Fachbücher zur Bewertung heranziehen ist in diesem Falle nicht geignet. So sehe ich es.
